2025/03/11

What Not to Say – A Guide for the Well-Meaning but Clueless


1. Social & Casual Conversations

Everyday interactions should be easy, but sometimes well-meaning comments come across as rude, awkward, or downright offensive. Here’s a deeper look at things you should avoid saying in casual conversations—and why they might not land the way you intended.

❌ "You look tired."

  • Why it’s a problem: Instead of showing concern, it comes off as pointing out someone’s appearance in a negative way.
  • Better approach: “Is everything okay?” or “How are you feeling today?”

❌ "Are you pregnant?"

  • Why it’s a problem: Unless someone explicitly announces it, never assume! You could be wrong, or the person might be dealing with health issues, weight changes, or a recent loss.
  • Better approach: Just don’t ask. If they’re pregnant and want you to know, they’ll tell you.

❌ "Wow, you've lost weight! You look so much better!"

  • Why it’s a problem: It suggests they didn’t look good before. Plus, weight loss isn’t always intentional or positive—it could be due to stress or illness.
  • Better approach: “You look great!” (without mentioning weight.)

❌ "That’s so interesting!" (without elaboration)

  • Why it’s a problem: It can sound dismissive, as if you’re not actually interested but just being polite.
  • Better approach: “That’s interesting because…” and follow up with a question or comment to show engagement.

❌ "You should smile more."

  • Why it’s a problem: It’s condescending and often directed at women, making it feel controlling. People don’t exist to appear cheerful for others.
  • Better approach: Just let people exist as they are.

❌ "Everything happens for a reason."

  • Why it’s a problem: It can come across as dismissive when someone is struggling. Sometimes, bad things just happen, and people need empathy, not clichés.
  • Better approach: “That sounds really tough. How can I support you?”

❌ "I could never do that."

(Said about parenting choices, diet, career decisions, etc.)

  • Why it’s a problem: It sounds like judgment, even if you don’t mean it that way.
  • Better approach: “That’s interesting! How did you decide to do it that way?”

❌ "You’re too young to understand."

  • Why it’s a problem: It’s dismissive and condescending, even if unintentional.
  • Better approach: Explain things simply or engage them in conversation instead of shutting them down.

❌ "It’s just a joke!" (After an offensive or awkward remark.)

  • Why it’s a problem: If someone is hurt, saying this makes it worse and dismisses their feelings.
  • Better approach: If your joke didn’t land, just say, “Sorry about that, I didn’t mean to offend.

2. Workplace & Professional Settings

Navigating workplace conversations requires a balance of professionalism, respect, and clarity. Sometimes, well-meaning or casual remarks can come across as dismissive, unprofessional, or even damaging to relationships. Here’s a breakdown of things you shouldn’t say at work and better ways to communicate effectively.


❌ "No offense, but..."

  • Why it’s a problem: This phrase is almost always followed by something offensive. It doesn’t soften the blow—it just warns people they’re about to be insulted.
  • Better approach: If feedback is necessary, be direct but constructive. Instead of “No offense, but your report was unclear,” try “I think adding more data points to your report could make the insights clearer.”

❌ "Calm down."

  • Why it’s a problem: This almost never calms anyone down. Instead, it can feel dismissive, especially when someone is expressing frustration or concern.
  • Better approach: Acknowledge their feelings instead. Try, “I can see this is frustrating. How can I help?”

❌ "That’s not my job."

  • Why it’s a problem: While it’s important to maintain boundaries, saying this outright makes you sound unhelpful and unwilling to collaborate.
  • Better approach: If you truly can’t help, redirect them instead. Try, “I’m not the best person for this, but you might want to check with [name or department].”

❌ "You’re so lucky!" (About promotions, perks, or successes.)

  • Why it’s a problem: It dismisses someone’s hard work and makes their achievements seem like a fluke rather than earned.
  • Better approach: Acknowledge the effort behind their success: “You worked hard for that promotion—congrats!”

❌ "We’ve always done it this way."

  • Why it’s a problem: This phrase signals resistance to change and innovation. Just because something has always been done a certain way doesn’t mean it’s the best way.
  • Better approach: If you have concerns about a proposed change, ask questions instead: “What’s the reasoning behind this new approach?”

❌ "Let’s circle back on that."

  • Why it’s a problem: This often sounds like a way to avoid discussing something, especially if it’s never brought up again.
  • Better approach: If you genuinely want to revisit the topic, set a specific follow-up: “Let’s schedule a check-in on this next week.”

❌ "It’s just common sense."

  • Why it’s a problem: What’s common sense to one person might not be obvious to another. This phrase can come across as condescending.
  • Better approach: Instead, explain your point clearly: “From my experience, this approach tends to work well because…”

❌ "This might be a dumb question, but..."

  • Why it’s a problem: It undermines your own confidence before you even ask the question.
  • Better approach: Just ask the question! “Can you clarify how this process works?”

❌ "I don’t get paid enough for this."

  • Why it’s a problem: While many employees feel overworked and underpaid, saying this out loud can come across as unprofessional and demotivating.
  • Better approach: If you truly feel undervalued, discuss it professionally with your manager: “I’d like to revisit my role and compensation. Can we schedule a time to discuss it?”

❌ "I’ll try to get to it."

  • Why it’s a problem: It sounds noncommittal and vague, leaving the other person unsure if you’ll actually follow through.
  • Better approach: Give a clear response: “I can work on that by Friday” or “I don’t have the bandwidth for that right now, but I can help next week.”

❌ "That’s above my pay grade."

  • Why it’s a problem: While it’s sometimes true, it can make you seem uninterested in taking initiative or contributing beyond your role.
  • Better approach: If something is outside your authority, phrase it differently: “I don’t have the final say, but I can bring it up with [relevant person].”

❌ "Wow, you’re so young to be in this role!"

  • Why it’s a problem: It might seem like a compliment, but it can also imply doubt about someone’s experience or capabilities.
  • Better approach: Focus on their skills instead: “It’s impressive how much expertise you have in this area!”

❌ "You wouldn’t understand."

  • Why it’s a problem: It’s dismissive and makes people feel excluded from the conversation.
  • Better approach: Instead, try explaining in a way that invites discussion: “It’s a bit complicated, but here’s a quick breakdown…”

❌ "That’s a stupid idea."

  • Why it’s a problem: Even if an idea isn’t great, shutting it down harshly discourages creative thinking and collaboration.
  • Better approach: Offer constructive feedback: “I see some challenges with that approach. Maybe we could tweak it by…”

❌ "You’re doing it wrong."

  • Why it’s a problem: This phrase is too blunt and can make people feel defensive.
  • Better approach: Guide them instead: “Here’s a different approach that might work better.”

❌ "You’re too sensitive."

  • Why it’s a problem: It invalidates someone’s feelings and can make the workplace feel hostile.
  • Better approach: Try, “I didn’t mean to upset you. Let’s talk about it.”

❌ "You should be grateful you have a job."

  • Why it’s a problem: While job security is important, this phrase can feel dismissive of legitimate workplace concerns.
  • Better approach: If someone is struggling, acknowledge their feelings: “I hear you. What would make your work situation better?”

3. Family & Relationships

  • "When are you getting married?" (Unsolicited pressure.)
  • "When are you having kids?" (Deeply personal and intrusive.)
  • "You remind me of my ex." (A red flag in any relationship.)
  • "Why are you still single?" (Suggests something is wrong with them.)
  • "At least they lived a long life." (Not comforting after a loss.)

4. Parenting & Kids

Parenting is already challenging, and well-meaning but clueless comments can add unnecessary pressure, frustration, or even guilt. Whether you’re talking to parents or children, certain phrases can come across as judgmental, dismissive, or intrusive—even if you didn’t mean them that way. Here’s a breakdown of what not to say and better alternatives for supportive conversations.


❌ "You’re having another one?" (Or, "Was this planned?")

  • Why it’s a problem: Asking about family planning is deeply personal. It can make parents feel judged, or worse, it could be painful if they’ve struggled with fertility issues or loss.
  • Better approach: If they announce a pregnancy, just say, “That’s wonderful news! Congratulations!”

❌ "Boys will be boys."

  • Why it’s a problem: This phrase is often used to excuse bad behavior, like aggression or rudeness, instead of addressing it. It reinforces gender stereotypes and can be harmful.
  • Better approach: Acknowledge the behavior without making it about gender. “Kids can be energetic—how do you usually handle it?”

❌ "Is he/she a good baby?"

  • Why it’s a problem: Babies aren’t “good” or “bad.” They cry, wake up at night, and need attention because they’re babies—not because they’re misbehaving.
  • Better approach: Ask, “How’s the baby doing?” or “How are you holding up with the little one?”

❌ "Enjoy every moment!"

  • Why it’s a problem: While it’s true that childhood goes by quickly, this phrase can make parents feel guilty for struggling with the difficult moments. Parenting is exhausting, and it’s okay not to enjoy every single second.
  • Better approach: “I hope you’re finding some moments of joy. If you ever need a break, I’d love to help.”

❌ "When are you having kids?"

  • Why it’s a problem: This can be incredibly intrusive, especially if someone is dealing with infertility, doesn’t want kids, or isn’t ready. It can also put unnecessary pressure on couples.
  • Better approach: Don’t ask. Let people share if they want to.

❌ "You’re doing it wrong." (Or, “That’s not how I did it with my kids.”)

  • Why it’s a problem: Parenting styles change over time, and what worked for one person’s family may not work for another. This comment can make parents feel criticized instead of supported.
  • Better approach: “Every kid is different! What’s been working best for you so far?”

❌ "You’re spoiling them."

  • Why it’s a problem: This is often said when parents comfort, hold, or respond to their child’s needs. But meeting a child’s emotional needs isn’t spoiling—it’s parenting.
  • Better approach: If you’re worried about boundaries, ask, “What kind of approach do you find works best for them?”

❌ "If that were my kid, I’d…"

  • Why it’s a problem: No one likes unsolicited parenting advice, especially from people who don’t know their child’s unique needs and challenges.
  • Better approach: Only offer advice if asked. Otherwise, say, “Parenting looks tough—you’re doing great.”

❌ "Wow, you’ve got your hands full!"

  • Why it’s a problem: Parents, especially those with multiple kids, hear this constantly. It’s rarely helpful and can feel overwhelming.
  • Better approach: “You’re doing an amazing job. Let me know if you ever need a hand!”

❌ "When are you going back to work?" (To stay-at-home parents.)

  • Why it’s a problem: This assumes that parenting isn’t real work, which can be insulting. Stay-at-home parents already work full-time raising their kids.
  • Better approach: “How’s it been adjusting to your new routine?”

❌ "You let them do that?"

  • Why it’s a problem: Every family has different rules and parenting styles. This kind of question sounds judgmental.
  • Better approach: If you’re genuinely curious, ask, “What made you decide to try that approach?”

❌ "Why don’t you have more kids?" (Or, “Only one? Won’t they be lonely?”)

  • Why it’s a problem: Family size is a personal choice, and there are many reasons people may only have one child (or none).
  • Better approach: “Your child is lucky to have such loving parents.”

❌ "She’s such a tomboy!" (Or, “That’s not very ladylike.”)

  • Why it’s a problem: These comments enforce outdated gender norms and can make kids feel self-conscious about their interests.
  • Better approach: Let kids be themselves. Instead of labeling, say, “She’s really active and adventurous!”

❌ "Big boys don’t cry."

  • Why it’s a problem: Teaching boys to suppress their emotions can lead to emotional struggles later in life.
  • Better approach: “It’s okay to feel sad. I’m here if you want to talk about it.”

❌ "Oh, just wait until they’re teenagers!"

  • Why it’s a problem: It makes parenting sound like a constant nightmare, which isn’t helpful. Not all teens are difficult, and each stage of childhood has its challenges and joys.
  • Better approach: “I remember those years—it’s amazing to see how they grow and change!”

❌ "You’ll miss this when they’re older."

  • Why it’s a problem: While nostalgia is real, this can make exhausted parents feel like they’re failing for not savoring every moment.
  • Better approach: “It’s hard now, but you’re doing a great job.”

❌ "What do you do all day?" (To stay-at-home parents.)

  • Why it’s a problem: This implies that raising kids isn’t real work, which is both insulting and untrue.
  • Better approach: “Parenting is a full-time job! How do you usually spend your days with the kids?”

❌ "Why do you let them eat that?" (Or, “They should eat more [healthy food].”)

  • Why it’s a problem: Unless a child is in danger, other people’s food choices aren’t your business. Parenting is hard enough without food guilt.
  • Better approach: “That looks delicious! What’s their favorite meal?”

Final Thoughts

The best way to support parents is to avoid judgment, offer encouragement, and respect different parenting choices. If you’re unsure what to say, try:

"That must be tough—how can I help?"
"You’re doing an amazing job."
"Every kid is different, and you know them best!"


5. Health & Body Image

Talking about health and body image is tricky because what seems like a compliment or friendly remark can often be unintentionally hurtful. Many people struggle with body image, chronic illnesses, or invisible disabilities, and careless comments can add to their stress. Here's a deeper look at what not to say and better alternatives for sensitive conversations.


❌ "You’ve lost weight! You look amazing!"

  • Why it’s a problem: While weight loss is often praised, it may not always be intentional or positive. Someone could be struggling with illness, stress, or an eating disorder. This also reinforces the idea that thinner = better.
  • Better approach: If you genuinely want to compliment someone, focus on how they feel, not how they look: “You look happy and confident!” or “You seem really energized!”

❌ "Are you pregnant?"

  • Why it’s a problem: If they are pregnant and haven’t announced it, it’s invasive. If they aren’t, it’s extremely embarrassing. Some people also struggle with fertility issues, making this question painful.
  • Better approach: Just never ask. If they want to share, they will.

❌ "You don’t look sick/disabled."

  • Why it’s a problem: Many conditions, including chronic illnesses, disabilities, and mental health disorders, are invisible. This phrase invalidates their experience and can make them feel like they need to "prove" their struggles.
  • Better approach: “How have you been feeling lately?” or “Is there anything I can do to support you?”

❌ "You should try this diet/workout/supplement!"

  • Why it’s a problem: Unsolicited health advice assumes that someone hasn’t already explored options. It can also be dismissive of medical conditions that require professional treatment.
  • Better approach: Only offer advice if asked. Otherwise, simply say, “I hope you’re feeling well—let me know if you ever need support.”

❌ "Wow, I could never do that diet!" (Said about someone eating vegan, keto, gluten-free, etc.)

  • Why it’s a problem: It makes the conversation about you rather than respecting their choices.
  • Better approach: If you’re curious, ask in a neutral way: “What made you decide to try that?”

❌ "You’re too young to have that problem!"

  • Why it’s a problem: Health conditions don’t care about age. Saying this can make people feel dismissed or unheard.
  • Better approach: “That sounds challenging—how are you managing?”

❌ "Have you tried yoga/meditation/essential oils?" (As a response to chronic illness, mental health struggles, or pain.)

  • Why it’s a problem: While these things can be helpful, they are not cures. People with chronic illnesses have usually heard every suggestion before.
  • Better approach: “I can’t imagine what that’s like for you. How can I support you?”

❌ "I wish I had your metabolism!" (Or, “I hate you, you can eat whatever you want!”)

  • Why it’s a problem: Comments like these can make people feel uncomfortable about their body, even if they’re naturally thin. Many people with fast metabolisms struggle to gain weight or feel self-conscious about being "too skinny."
  • Better approach: Avoid making body comparisons altogether. Instead, compliment something unrelated: “You have great energy!”

❌ "You’ve gained some weight!" (Or, “You look healthier now!” when someone has gained weight.)

  • Why it’s a problem: Any comment about weight—gain or loss—can be hurtful. Even if you mean well, it might make someone feel self-conscious.
  • Better approach: Focus on their well-being: “It’s great to see you! How have you been?”

❌ "At least you’re still beautiful!" (Said to someone with a chronic illness, disability, or injury.)

  • Why it’s a problem: This suggests that physical appearance is the most important thing about them.
  • Better approach: Show empathy without reducing them to their looks: “I admire your strength and resilience.”

❌ "I wish I had your problem!" (Said to people who struggle with weight gain, high metabolism, or food allergies.)

  • Why it’s a problem: Struggling to gain weight or dealing with food restrictions is not a blessing. It can be just as distressing as struggling with weight loss.
  • Better approach: Just don’t compare body struggles. Instead, offer support: “That sounds tough. How do you manage it?”

❌ "You’re too pretty/handsome to be single!"

  • Why it’s a problem: This implies that physical appearance should determine someone’s relationship status, as if being single is a flaw.
  • Better approach: If you want to encourage someone, say, “Anyone would be lucky to be with you!”

❌ "You should dress for your body type."

  • Why it’s a problem: This assumes there are "right" and "wrong" ways to dress based on body size, which is outdated and body-shaming.
  • Better approach: If you want to compliment someone, do it without qualifiers: “That outfit looks amazing on you!”

❌ "You need to eat more!" (Or, “Are you sure you’re eating enough?” to a naturally thin person.)

  • Why it’s a problem: Just like telling someone to eat less, this comment can make people self-conscious. It also assumes that thinness = unhealthy.
  • Better approach: Don’t comment on other people’s food intake. Instead, if they seem unwell, ask, “How are you feeling lately?”

❌ "You look so young for your age!" (Or, “You don’t look that old!”)

  • Why it’s a problem: While meant as a compliment, it suggests that looking older is a bad thing. Aging is normal and shouldn’t be something to “avoid.”
  • Better approach: If you want to compliment someone, focus on their energy or style: “You have such a great presence!”

❌ "Have you lost weight?!" (Said with excitement.)

  • Why it’s a problem: This assumes weight loss is always good news. The person could be struggling with illness, stress, or grief.
  • Better approach: Compliment something unrelated to their weight: “You seem really happy!”

Final Thoughts

Conversations about health and body image should focus on support, respect, and kindness—not weight, size, or unsolicited advice. If you’re unsure what to say, stick to these simple guidelines:

Compliment how someone makes you feel, not how they look.
Avoid comments about weight gain, weight loss, or food habits.
Listen with empathy instead of offering advice.
Respect that health is personal and not for public discussion.

6. Money & Finances

Money is a sensitive topic, and even well-meaning comments can come across as judgmental, intrusive, or dismissive. Whether discussing salaries, spending habits, or financial choices, it’s important to be respectful and mindful of different circumstances. Here’s a deeper look at what not to say and better ways to approach money-related conversations.


❌ "How much do you make?"

  • Why it’s a problem: Salary is a personal topic, and many people aren’t comfortable sharing their earnings. It can also create awkwardness, envy, or even resentment.
  • Better approach: If you’re discussing industry salaries for career research, phrase it as: “What’s a typical salary range for someone in your role?”

❌ "Must be nice to afford that!"

  • Why it’s a problem: This can sound passive-aggressive or imply that someone doesn’t deserve their wealth. You don’t know their financial situation—maybe they saved for years, or maybe they have financial struggles you don’t see.
  • Better approach: If you admire something they have, simply say: “That’s really nice! How did you decide on it?”

❌ "Why don’t you just buy a house?"

  • Why it’s a problem: Buying a home isn’t as simple as just wanting one. Many people can’t afford it due to high prices, debt, or life circumstances. This question can feel dismissive of financial realities.
  • Better approach: Instead of assuming homeownership is easy, say: “What’s your ideal living situation?”

❌ "I’d never spend that much on that."

  • Why it’s a problem: Everyone has different spending priorities. What seems excessive to you might be a meaningful or practical investment for someone else. This comment can sound judgmental.
  • Better approach: Respect different financial choices: “That’s an interesting purchase—what made you choose it?”

❌ "You should invest in [stocks/crypto/real estate]!" (Unsolicited financial advice.)

  • Why it’s a problem: Not everyone is comfortable with investing, and financial decisions should be based on personal goals and risk tolerance.
  • Better approach: If you want to share insights, ask: “Are you interested in investing? I’ve learned some things that might help if you ever want to chat.”

❌ "If you just worked harder, you’d be rich."

  • Why it’s a problem: Hard work doesn’t guarantee wealth. Many factors—family background, education, systemic barriers, opportunities, and even luck—play a role.
  • Better approach: Recognize challenges: “Financial growth is tough. What are your career goals?”

❌ "It’s just money!" (Said to someone worried about finances.)

  • Why it’s a problem: For many people, money isn’t just money—it’s security, stability, and survival. Saying this can feel dismissive of their stress.
  • Better approach: Show empathy: “I understand why that’s stressful. Do you want to talk about it?”

❌ "How much did that cost?"

  • Why it’s a problem: Asking about the price of someone’s belongings can feel intrusive. Some people are comfortable sharing, but others may feel uncomfortable or judged.
  • Better approach: If they want to share, they will. Instead, say: “That’s really nice! Where did you find it?”

❌ "You must be rich!" (Said when someone makes a big purchase.)

  • Why it’s a problem: Not everyone who spends money on something expensive is “rich.” They may have saved for years, received a gift, or prioritized this over other expenses.
  • Better approach: Instead of assuming wealth, say: “That’s a great choice—what made you pick it?”

❌ "You’re throwing your money away on rent."

  • Why it’s a problem: Renting isn’t a waste—it provides flexibility, avoids property maintenance costs, and suits different lifestyles. Not everyone can or wants to own a home.
  • Better approach: Respect choices: “What do you like about renting?”

❌ "Why don’t you have kids yet? They’re not that expensive."

  • Why it’s a problem: Raising children is a major financial responsibility, and everyone’s financial priorities are different. Also, some people may be struggling with infertility.
  • Better approach: Don’t ask. If they want to share, they will.

❌ "They’re so cheap!" / "They’re so rich!" (Talking about someone’s spending habits.)

  • Why it’s a problem: Judging people for spending too much or too little can make them feel uncomfortable.
  • Better approach: If someone is frugal or generous, respect their financial style. Instead of labeling, say: “They’re really mindful about their finances.”

❌ "Why don’t you ask your parents for help?"

  • Why it’s a problem: Not everyone has financially supportive parents, and some people prefer financial independence. This comment can also assume privilege.
  • Better approach: If someone is struggling, ask: “Would it help to explore some financial options together?”

❌ "Retail therapy always works!"

  • Why it’s a problem: While shopping can be fun, encouraging spending as a coping mechanism can lead to financial stress and unhealthy habits.
  • Better approach: Offer alternatives: “Want to do something fun together?”

❌ "You should save more money." (Unsolicited advice.)

  • Why it’s a problem: You don’t know someone’s full financial situation. They could be paying off debt, supporting family, or dealing with unexpected expenses.
  • Better approach: Instead of assuming, say: “Do you have any financial goals you’re working on?”

❌ "Why don’t you just get another job?"

  • Why it’s a problem: Finding a job isn’t always easy, and balancing multiple jobs can be exhausting. This comment can feel dismissive of someone’s struggles.
  • Better approach: If they’re looking for work, ask: “Would you like help with your job search?”

Final Thoughts

Money is a deeply personal topic, and conversations about finances should be handled with care, respect, and sensitivity. Instead of assuming or judging, try:

Respecting different financial choices.
Avoiding direct questions about salary, spending, or savings.
Offering support instead of unsolicited advice.
Acknowledging that financial struggles are real and complex.

7. Cultural & Racial Insensitivity

Cultural and racial insensitivity often comes from a place of ignorance rather than malice. However, well-meaning comments can still be offensive, othering, or dismissive. Understanding why certain phrases are problematic and learning better ways to engage can lead to more respectful and inclusive conversations.


❌ "Where are you really from?"

  • Why it’s a problem: This question assumes that someone who doesn’t look or sound like the majority must be foreign, even if they were born and raised in the same country as you. It can make people feel like they don’t belong.
  • Better approach: If you're curious about someone’s background, let them share it naturally. Instead, ask, “What’s your cultural background?” or “Do you have any family traditions you love?”

❌ "You speak English so well!"

  • Why it’s a problem: While it may sound like a compliment, it assumes that the person isn’t expected to speak English fluently. It can feel patronizing, especially to someone who grew up speaking English.
  • Better approach: Just engage in conversation without commenting on language skills. If you’re genuinely impressed, you could say, “You’re so well-spoken.”

❌ "I don’t see color."

  • Why it’s a problem: While meant to promote equality, this phrase ignores racial identity and the real experiences that come with it. It dismisses the challenges and discrimination people of color face.
  • Better approach: “I respect and appreciate different cultures and backgrounds.” Or, “I want to be aware of and learn from different perspectives.”

❌ "You’re so exotic."

  • Why it’s a problem: This phrase objectifies people and makes them feel like an outsider or curiosity rather than a person. It also reduces their identity to something unusual or different from the norm.
  • Better approach: Compliment something specific without making it about race or ethnicity: “That’s a beautiful outfit!” or “I love your style.”

❌ "Can I touch your hair?" (Or worse, touching without asking!)

  • Why it’s a problem: This is an invasion of personal space and can feel dehumanizing, particularly for Black individuals whose hair is often treated as an object of fascination.
  • Better approach: Just don’t ask. Treat people’s hair like you would treat anyone else’s personal space—with respect.

❌ "You don’t act like a [racial stereotype]."

  • Why it’s a problem: This implies that there’s a “right” way to be part of a racial or cultural group, reinforcing stereotypes and invalidating personal identity.
  • Better approach: Recognize that individuals are unique. If you want to compliment someone, do so without tying it to their race.

❌ "You must be good at [math/dancing/sports] because you're [race/ethnicity]."

  • Why it’s a problem: Even if this is meant as a compliment, it enforces stereotypes that assume people have certain skills based on their background rather than their individual abilities.
  • Better approach: Recognize individual talents without making assumptions. “You’re really skilled at [subject/activity]!”

❌ "You people..."

  • Why it’s a problem: This phrase generalizes and groups people into an identity rather than treating them as individuals. It can sound condescending or even racist.
  • Better approach: Refer to individuals or specific groups without broad generalizations.

❌ "I had a [Black/Asian/Latino/etc.] friend once!"

  • Why it’s a problem: Mentioning a single friend of a certain background as proof that you’re not prejudiced can come off as tokenizing and performative.
  • Better approach: If you genuinely want to share cultural appreciation, focus on what you learned or enjoyed about their experiences instead of using it as proof of inclusivity.

❌ "You’re pretty for a [racial/ethnic group]."

  • Why it’s a problem: This backhanded compliment suggests that attractiveness is surprising for someone from a particular group, which is both offensive and unnecessary.
  • Better approach: Just say, “You’re beautiful” without the qualifier.

❌ "I wish I had your skin tone!" (Or any comment about racial features.)

  • Why it’s a problem: While meant as a compliment, it can come across as trivializing someone’s racial identity. It also ignores the discrimination that people of color may face for their features.
  • Better approach: Compliment something about them that isn’t tied to race, like their style or personality.

❌ "Do you even speak [your supposed native language]?"

  • Why it’s a problem: Not everyone speaks the language associated with their ethnicity, and asking this can make them feel like they don’t belong to their own cultural group.
  • Better approach: If you’re curious, say something like, “Did you grow up speaking multiple languages?”

❌ "Wow, I love [cultural food]. I could eat it every day!"

  • Why it’s a problem: While appreciation is great, comments like this can feel like you’re reducing a culture to its cuisine rather than respecting it holistically.
  • Better approach: Instead, ask about their favorite cultural foods or cooking traditions: “What’s a dish from your culture that you love making?”

❌ "What are you?"

  • Why it’s a problem: This question treats someone like an object of curiosity rather than a person. It also implies that their racial or ethnic identity is something unusual.
  • Better approach: If it’s relevant to the conversation, ask, “Do you have a cultural background you connect with?”

Final Thoughts

Cultural sensitivity is about respect, curiosity, and awareness. Instead of making assumptions or unintentionally reinforcing stereotypes, try:

Listening to personal stories
Asking thoughtful, open-ended questions
Celebrating diversity without objectifying it
Avoiding labels and assumptions

8. Mental Health & Emotional Support

Mental health is just as important as physical health, yet many well-meaning comments can feel dismissive, invalidating, or even harmful. When someone opens up about their struggles, they need support—not clichés, toxic positivity, or unsolicited advice. Here’s a breakdown of what not to say and better alternatives that actually help.


❌ "Just think positive!"

  • Why it’s a problem: This implies that mental health struggles are just a mindset issue and can be solved by sheer willpower. It dismisses real emotional pain and makes the person feel unheard.
  • Better approach: “I’m here for you. Do you want to talk about what’s been on your mind?”

❌ "Other people have it worse."

  • Why it’s a problem: Comparing struggles doesn’t help. Pain is relative, and someone else suffering more doesn’t make another person’s pain any less real.
  • Better approach: “I see that you’re struggling, and that’s completely valid. How can I support you?”

❌ "You don’t look depressed/anxious."

  • Why it’s a problem: Mental health challenges aren’t always visible. Many people are good at masking their struggles, and this comment can make them feel like they need to prove their pain.
  • Better approach: “How have you been feeling lately? I’m here if you ever want to talk.”

❌ "Have you tried yoga/meditation/exercise?"

  • Why it’s a problem: While these activities can be beneficial, they’re not a cure-all. Mental health conditions often require professional help, not just lifestyle changes. This can make the person feel like they’re not trying hard enough.
  • Better approach: “Would you like help finding resources or talking to someone? I want to support you in whatever way you need.”

❌ "It’s all in your head."

  • Why it’s a problem: This phrase completely invalidates someone’s experience. Mental health conditions have biological, psychological, and environmental causes—they’re not imaginary.
  • Better approach: “I believe you. You’re not alone in this.”

❌ "You just need to snap out of it."

  • Why it’s a problem: Mental health struggles aren’t a choice. No one chooses to be anxious, depressed, or overwhelmed, and telling them to “snap out of it” is dismissive.
  • Better approach: “It sounds like you’re going through a lot. Do you want to talk, or would you rather I just sit with you for a bit?”

❌ "Suicide is selfish."

  • Why it’s a problem: This statement adds guilt and shame to someone who may already be in deep distress. People considering suicide often feel like a burden and need empathy, not judgment.
  • Better approach: “I care about you. You’re important to me. If you ever need to talk, I’m here.” (And encourage them to seek professional help.)

❌ "You don’t need therapy. Just talk to me."

  • Why it’s a problem: Friends and loved ones can offer support, but they’re not trained therapists. Mental health professionals provide specialized care that friends can’t replace.
  • Better approach: “I’m happy to listen, and I also encourage you to talk to a therapist. They can offer tools and support that I might not be able to.”

❌ "Stop being so dramatic."

  • Why it’s a problem: This invalidates emotions and discourages people from sharing their struggles.
  • Better approach: “I can see this is really affecting you. What can I do to help?”

❌ "God doesn’t give you more than you can handle."

  • Why it’s a problem: While this may be well-intended, it assumes that suffering is part of a divine plan, which may not be comforting to someone struggling. It can also make people feel like they should be able to handle everything alone.
  • Better approach: “I know this is hard, and you don’t have to go through it alone.”

❌ "You should be grateful for what you have."

  • Why it’s a problem: Gratitude is important, but it doesn’t erase mental health struggles. This phrase can make people feel guilty for their feelings.
  • Better approach: “I know you’re struggling. If you ever want to talk about what’s on your mind, I’m here.”

❌ "You always seem fine to me."

  • Why it’s a problem: Many people hide their struggles well. Just because someone seems okay doesn’t mean they are.
  • Better approach: “I know you put on a brave face, but if you ever need to talk, I’ll listen without judgment.”

❌ "You’re so strong, you’ll get through this."

  • Why it’s a problem: While this may sound encouraging, it can put pressure on someone to appear strong when they’re actually struggling.
  • Better approach: “You don’t have to be strong all the time. It’s okay to ask for help.”

❌ "Why are you anxious? Just relax!"

  • Why it’s a problem: Anxiety isn’t a choice. If it were as simple as “just relaxing,” people wouldn’t suffer from it.
  • Better approach: “I know anxiety can feel overwhelming. Do you want to talk through what’s on your mind?”

Final Thoughts

When supporting someone with mental health struggles, the most important things you can do are:
Listen without judgment
Acknowledge their feelings
Encourage professional help when needed
Remind them they’re not alone

9. Dating & Romance

  • "You should lower your standards." (Patronizing.)
  • "When you stop looking, you’ll find someone." (Not helpful.)
  • "You complete me." (Unhealthy relationship mindset.)
  • "You deserve better." (Often unhelpful post-breakup.)
  • "Happy wife, happy life." (Oversimplifies relationships.)

10. Religion & Beliefs

  • "I’ll pray for you." (Can feel dismissive if unsolicited.)
  • "Everything happens for a reason." (Not always comforting.)
  • "You just need more faith." (Minimizes struggles.)
  • "God never gives you more than you can handle." (Often untrue.)
  • "Why don’t you believe in [my religion]?" (Intrusive.)

2025/03/10

CVE-2025-27840

 CVE-2025-27840 確實存在:這個漏洞編號已正式收錄在 MITRE CVE 清單和 NVD 國家漏洞資料庫中。NVD 的描述指出:「Espressif ESP32 晶片允許執行 29 個隱藏的 HCI 指令,例如 0xFC02(寫入記憶體)」。該漏洞由西班牙資安公司 Tarlogic 的研究人員在 2025 年 3 月的 RootedCON 大會上披露​

。因此可以確認 CVE-2025-27840 是真實的安全漏洞,已在官方資料庫中記錄並公佈。Espressif 官方亦知悉此事,並於 3 月10日透過官微發表說明,強調這些隱藏指令其實是供測試用的內部調試命令,並非刻意留下的「後門」​。他們表示 Tarlogic 已更新用詞為「隱藏功能」而非「後門」,某些媒體的最初報導用詞有所誤導​。Espressif 說明這些指令無法遠程觸發,不能透過藍牙、無線電或網際網路直接存取,因此對一般使用情境不構成直接風險​

29 個隱藏指令內容與功能:研究人員透過分析 ESP32 藍牙韌體的供應商自訂 HCI 指令(Opcode Group 0x3F)區段,發現了 29 個未公開的指令​

。Tarlogic 在簡報中列出了這些指令的操作碼(0xFC01~0xFC44,不連續)及用途。以下摘錄其中主要幾類指令的功能:

  • 記憶體與快閃存取類:包括讀取記憶體 (0xFC01)寫入記憶體 (0xFC02),可直接存取控制器的RAM內容​

    。還有讀取快閃 (0xFC08)寫入快閃 (0xFC07)擦除快閃 (0xFC06)取得快閃ID (0xFC05)等,用於存取或修改ESP32內部的Flash記憶體。這些也意味著能在晶片上植入或讀出資料。另有讀取/寫入 NVDS 參數 (0xFC09/0xFC0A)刪除 NVDS 參數 (0xFC03),NVDS 是非易失性資料存儲區,可能包含裝置配置,例如校準參數或藍牙設定。

  • 裝置控制與無線參數類:包含暫存器讀/寫 (0xFC30/0xFC31),可讀取或改寫底層硬體暫存器;RF 寄存器讀/寫 (0xFC39/0xFC3A),預留給射頻設置(但簡報註明未實作)。設定 MAC 位址 (0xFC32)允許修改藍牙裝置的MAC地址(裝置位址),達成裝置身分偽裝。**設定發射功率 (0xFC3B)**可調整無線電的 Tx 功率等級(用於射頻測試或調校)。**設定 BLE 參數 (0xFC40)寫入 BLE 預設值 (0xFC41)**則用於調整低功耗藍牙的連線參數或預設組態。**開關共存模式 (0xFC0B)控制 Wi-Fi/Bluetooth 共存機制的啟停,可能影響無線協調。還有讀取核心統計 (0xFC10)提供控制器內部統計資訊,以及平臺重置 (0xFC11)**可讓攻擊者觸發裝置重啟。**讀取記憶體資訊 (0xFC12)**則可能提供記憶體區域的概況。

  • 低階藍牙協定封包類:這些指令繞過一般 Host/Controller 分工,允許直接注入或攔截藍牙鏈路層的封包訊息。傳送 LMP 封包 (0xFC0E)可由主機發送自訂的連線管理協定封包(LMP,用於經典藍牙裝置配對/連線層),傳送 LLCP 封包 (0xFC43)則針對低功耗藍牙的鏈路層控制協定封包(LLCP)。這意味著主機端可以發送一般情況下不允許的底層控制訊息,可能用於協定層攻擊或非常規操作。相應地,也有啟用 LLCP Pass-through (0xFC42)讓主機可以直接處理 LLCP、以及丟棄 LMP 訊息 (0xFC44)丟棄 LLCP 訊息 (0xFC36),可中止正常的藍牙握手或連線管理流程。另有重置接收計數 (0xFC37)重置發送計數 (0xFC38),可能用於清除封包計數器以隱匿通信量或進行測試。

上述每個指令原本用途多為內部調試和開發測試。例如,讀寫記憶體與暫存器方便韌體開發人員調試晶片狀態,發送/攔截底層封包可用於藍牙協定測試或驗證。這些指令平時並未公開在 Espressif 對開發者的文件中**(屬於藍牙 HCI 的供應商自訂命令空間)**。正因如此,Tarlogic 最初將它們稱作 ESP32 芯片中隱藏的「backdoor」,意指存在未告知使用者的額外功能入口。

安全性影響與攻擊情境:若攻擊者能夠利用這些指令,將對 ESP32 裝置的完整性構成威脅。研究報告指出,這些隱藏命令可用於任意讀寫晶片記憶體和快閃,意味攻擊者能竊取敏感資料或植入惡意程式至晶片。此外,MAC 位址偽裝讓攻擊者能冒充受信任的藍牙裝置身份,以在配對時騙過其他設備。更危險的是,透過 LMP/LLCP 這類底層封包的注入,攻擊者可以執行非常規的藍牙協定攻擊,例如繞過藍牙安全機制、截斷連線或發起中間人攻擊等。Tarlogic 警告這些能力可能被用來隱蔽地永久感染裝置,甚至藉由受控的 ESP32 對連網環境中的其他裝置發動攻擊。例如,受感染的ESP32可在暗中利用Wi-Fi或藍牙對鄰近設備發起滲透,成為物聯網設備中的跳板。另一個風險是供應鏈攻擊:若ESP32在出廠前或設備製造時被植入隱蔽惡意指令,攻擊者日後可遠程觸發(透過其控制的應用程式或韌體)這些隱藏功能來接管設備。

不過,需要強調的是,利用這些隱藏命令進行攻擊有相當高的門檻。CVE資料顯示此漏洞的攻擊複雜度高、需要高權限或實體接觸才能利用。換言之,攻擊者必須已能在裝置上執行任意程式碼或取得深度存取權限(例如取得裝置root權限、植入惡意韌體,或直接透過UART/USB連線)才能下達這些 HCI 指令。正如資安專家所指出的,如果攻擊者已經可以在ESP32上跑任意程式碼,那代表裝置本身早已遭到攻破,其危害程度可能超過這些調試指令本身。Espressif 官方也強調這些指令無法被遠程(無線)觸發

;只有在本地或內部軟體層面才可能執行。因此,對一般終端使用者而言,除非裝置已經遭入侵,否則這些隱藏命令不太可能成為直接攻擊途徑​。實務上更現實的風險在於某些惡意韌體或 OEM 設備製造商的惡意實作,可能故意或無意間利用這些指令來開啟隱藏功能。例如,不肖廠商或供應鏈中的攻擊者可以藉此在ESP32中埋藏隱蔽後門,以便日後存取設備。

相關技術細節與因應措施:Tarlogic 表示將在接下來數週內發布更詳細的技術報告與工具程式碼說明,以揭露這些隱藏指令的細節。目前Espressif並未發布針對此問題的固件更新或安全公告(可能因官方認為這屬正常調試功能且無遠端風險)。Espressif官方澄清這些為內部 HCI 調試指令,是實現藍牙控制器介面時的一部分,僅提供給開發人員使用,正常情況下終端使用者或遠端攻擊者無法接觸​

。他們也指出Tarlogic已將措辭從“backdoor”改為“hidden feature”(隱藏功能),以避免誤導​。多位資安專家亦支持這種看法,認為未公開的供應商指令並不罕見,許多藍牙晶片廠商(例如 Broadcom、Cypress、TI)也有類似的私人命令介面,用於韌體更新、校準等目的。是否構成漏洞取決於威脅模型:對一般用戶而言,若裝置主體與控制器本就沒有明確的權限區隔,則這些命令不致影響額外風險;但對某些高安全需求的場景而言,允許Host對Controller有如此深權限可能被視為設計隱患。針對謹慎的開發者,建議啟用ESP32的安全特性(如安全啟動 Secure Boot、快閃加密)來防範未經授權的韌體運行,避免攻擊者輕易植入能呼叫這些隱藏指令的程式碼。此外,可以持續關注 Espressif 未來的韌體更新或安全公告,瞭解官方是否提供選項停用這些調試命令。總體而言,CVE-2025-27840 所揭露的是ESP32晶片內部隱藏的調試功能,已被官方與研究單位確認存在。雖然這些指令本身提供了強大的低階控制能力,但在現實攻擊中需要配合其他漏洞或內部存取才能濫用。Espressif 對此的澄清和Tarlogic的後續更新表明,這更像是一個安全設計考量上的議題,提醒使用者和廠商注意供應鏈安全及裝置權限控管,而不是傳統意義上可被遠端利用的漏洞​

參考來源:

  • NVD 官方對 CVE-2025-27840 的條目;
  • Tarlogic 發布的新聞稿與 RootedCON 簡報摘要;
  • BleepingComputer 資安新聞對此漏洞的報導;
  • Espressif 官方對媒體的澄清聲明​
  • 資安專家對該事件的技術分析(Dark Mentor, flyingpenguin 等)。

2025/03/09

歌單 Birds Of Prey


Birds of Prey: The Album - Compilation by Various Artists | Spotify




“I Hate Myself For Loving You” - Joan Jett and the Blackhearts
“Feeling Good” - Sofi Tucker
“Boss B**ch” - Doja Cat
“Desde Que” - Liquits
“Joke’s On You” - Charlotte Lawrence
“Sweet Dreams (Of You)” - Patsy Cline
“I’m Gonna Love You Just a Little More, Baby” - Barry White
“Danger” - Jucee Froot
“It’s a Man’s Man’s Man’s World” - Jurnee Smollet-Bell
“Invisible Chains” - Lauren Jauregui
“So Thick” - WHIPPED CREAM featuring Baby Goth
“Unwind Yourself” - Marva Whitney
“Collage” - The Three Degrees
“Sway With Me” - Saweetie and GALXARA
“Diamonds Are A Girl’s Best Friend” - Marilyn Monroe
“Back At It” - Kelli Wakili
“Bow Out” - Kareema Weatherspoon
“Experiment On Me” - Halsey
“Black Betty” - Spiderbait
“Love Rollercoaster” - Ohio Players
“Sour Soul” - BADBADNOTGOOD & Ghostface Killah
“Hit Me With Your Best Shot” - Adona
“Barracuda” - Heart
“Lonely Gun” - Cyn
“El Vecino” - Sharlene, Lalo Ebratt, Trapical Minds
“Woman” - Kesha
“Diamonds” - Megan Thee Stallion and Normani
“Smile” - Maise Peters
“Bad Memory” - K. Flay

經常觀看直播的腦部活動與性格特徵差異研究

ChatGPT 4.5 DeepResearch 


腦部活動的變化:專注力與決策機制

專注力與默認模式網絡: 研究指出,長時間瀏覽網路資訊會削弱人們持續專注的能力,因為網路內容源源不絕地刺激大腦,使注意力分散​

。在實驗中,習慣同時處理多媒體資訊(例如一邊看直播一邊滑手機)的「重度多工」族群,在認知測試中的表現較差,更容易受無關刺激干擾​。這說明經常觀看直播等多媒體內容,可能使大腦更難長時間專注於單一任務。

決策機制與即時獎賞: 大腦成癮研究發現,不論是物質成癮或行為成癮(如網路/遊戲成癮),患者在風險決策時大腦有相似的異常模式:前額葉皮質(OFC)和紋狀體活動過度​

。這種現象與次優的決策行為有關,也就是說大腦的獎賞/價值區域過度活躍,可能導致忽視長遠後果、傾向即時滿足。針對個性化短影音的fMRI研究也發現類似趨勢:當受試者觀看演算法推薦的影片時,大腦默認模式網絡(DMN)呈現「功能分離」──掌管當下情境的子網絡顯著活躍,而負責未來規劃的部分則沒明顯啟動​。這解釋了為何沉浸於直播/短視頻時,觀眾只關注眼前刺激而忽略未來任務。換言之,經常追看直播可能讓人更傾向即時反應,對長期計畫的考量減少。

觀看直播與多巴胺獎賞機制

多巴胺的釋放: 從神經科學角度看,令人愉悅的活動都會引發大腦多巴胺釋放。例如,研究早已證實打電玩時大腦會釋放大量多巴胺​

。同樣地,追劇或觀看喜愛的直播會讓人產生類似「愉悅興奮感」,因為多巴胺讓我們感到快樂亢奮​。這種多巴胺驅動的高酣狀態和藥物帶來的快感機制相似​。當不斷追看時,大腦持續分泌多巴胺,增強行為的強化效果,讓人渴望不斷觀看以維持快感

獎賞迴路的強化: 精細的腦造影研究提供了直接證據。Su 等人(2021)的fMRI研究比較了抖音短視頻的個性化推薦內容與一般內容對大腦的影響,發現兩種影片都刺激中腦黑質(SN),而個性化推薦影片額外強烈激活了腹側被蓋區(VTA)

。SN和VTA都是大腦中負責多巴胺釋放的區域,因此個性化推送內容更強烈地啟動大腦獎賞系統。簡而言之,看直播(尤其是內容貼合興趣的直播)時,大腦的獎勵中樞被高度刺激,多巴胺迴路活躍,這解釋了為何觀眾會長時間沉迷其中。值得注意的是,這種獎賞系統的活化程度雖明顯增強,但仍不及成癮藥物對多巴胺系統的直接「劫持」​;也就是說,看直播引發的多巴胺高峰屬於強烈的愉悅反應,但尚無證據顯示它以和毒品相同的機制損害大腦

長期觀看對認知能力、衝動控制與情緒的影響

認知與注意力影響: 長期大量觀看直播或影片可能重塑大腦的結構與功能。大量研究表明,青少年過度網路/遊戲成癮會導致大腦功能和結構改變

。例如,一項針對154名14歲少年的國際研究發現,經常打電玩的青少年(每週超過9小時)相比很少玩者,左側腹側紋狀體體積更大,且在遊戲中失敗時該區域反應更強烈​。這顯示大腦獎賞中心因頻繁刺激而增生敏化。另一項由韓美科學家進行的實驗發現,連續10天每天玩超過1小時遊戲後,受試者看到遊戲相關提示時,大腦反應模式與毒癮者看到毒品時相似——背外側前額葉(DLPFC)、眶額皮質(OFC)、海馬旁回與丘腦等區域都被強烈激活​。上述區域涉及衝動抑制和情緒記憶,此結果意味著長時間沈迷於數位刺激(如遊戲或直播)會讓大腦對相關刺激產生類似上癮的反射,可能削弱理性控制。

衝動控制與延遲滿足: 近期對短影音沉迷的研究亦指出,自控力較低的人更容易產生直播/短視頻成癮症狀

。換言之,低衝動抑制力是直播沉迷的風險因子。同時,長期反覆接受即時獎賞會降低對延遲滿足的耐受度。有報告顯示,TikTok等短視頻會削弱年輕人的衝動控制能力和延遲滿足的判斷。這些觀眾的大腦持續被短暫強烈的娛樂刺激(對未知驚喜的期待)所驅動,多巴胺不斷分泌,類似反覆吃甜食或服用令人愉悅的物質​。長此以往,大腦可能習慣高強度刺激而難以適應平淡環境,一旦停止觀看便出現煩躁不安等反應​。臨床觀察也發現,一些沉迷追劇/直播的人在被打斷或被要求停止時,會變得易怒、焦躁,甚至不理性,甚至試圖隱瞞自己的觀看行為​。這反映長期沈迷可能干擾情緒調節,使人對直播產生依賴。

情緒調節與心理健康: 過度觀看直播除了影響即時的情緒高漲,長期看下來也可能帶來心理上的低落和孤立感。有研究指出,沉浸於數位媒體與主觀孤獨感的增加呈正相關​

。人們在連續看完多段影片或多集節目後,常報告出現落寞、挫折或空虛感。腦成像研究亦證實,網癮青少年的某些腦區灰質密度顯著低於正常人,包括與成癮相關的島葉,以及掌管情緒的扣帶回。此外,他們的大腦白質纖維也減少,導致神經信號傳遞變慢、回路混亂,進一步引起記憶力下降和情緒認知功能的紊亂。換言之,長期沈迷網路直播可能損及情緒管理能力,使人更難以在日常生活中調節情緒,甚至出現焦慮、抑鬱等問題​。不過,需要注意的是,目前關於長期直播觀看直接導致永久性大腦損傷的證據仍不充分,多數研究傾向於將其視為一種可逆的行為成癮效應,透過減少使用和心理干預可望改善。

直播觀看習慣與人格特質的關聯

內向與外向: 現有研究顯示,不同人格的人觀看直播的頻率存在顯著差異。一項對中國一般人群的調查發現,外向性(extraversion)與直播使用頻率呈負相關,而開放性(openness)呈正相關

。也就是說,較內向的人更傾向經常看直播,反之,外向社交者可能因現實社交活動多而較少沈浸於直播​。這項研究還指出,開放性高的人往往把直播當作獲取新資訊和娛樂的管道,因此更容易被吸引​。值得一提的是,直播觀眾中即使有高外向者,他們往往也傾向於互動聊天(如在直播聊天室發言)以滿足社交動機,而不是純粹被動觀看。

神經質與衝動傾向: 關於神經質(neuroticism)宜人性(agreeableness)的人格維度,研究結果顯示其與直播成癮性使用關係密切。Cheng 等人(2019)發現,較不友善(低宜人性)的人更容易沉迷直播,而神經質傾向高則預示更強的直播成癮傾向​

。這可能是因為神經質者常感到焦慮、不安,可能將直播視為逃避現實壓力或孤獨感的途徑​。相反地,宜人性高的人自律性和節制力較強,較能控制線上行為不上癮。​另一項研究也支持上述發現:自我控制力(與衝動性相反的特質)越低的人,越容易呈現直播成癮症狀​。這意味著衝動性人格(難以延遲滿足、控制慾望)可能使人更難抗拒直播的即時誘惑,因而長時間沈迷。

其他特質: 開放性人格與直播使用正相關,代表樂於嘗新的觀眾更傾向參與各種類型的直播​

。反之,嚴謹自律(勤勉性)可能在直播沉迷中扮演保護性角色——目前雖缺乏直接數據,但從網路成癮研究推測,高自律性的人較能節制上網時間,不易失控。此外,直播平台的社交互動屬性也吸引一些尋求社交認同的觀眾,例如有研究發現,直播觀眾打賞(送禮物)行為與社交動機相關,觀眾希望透過金錢支持來表現自我並獲得群體認同​。因此,性格孤獨或渴望認同的人,可能更積極參與此類互動。總體而言,目前學界已確認人格特質會影響觀看直播的頻率和方式:內向、好奇、衝動或情緒不穩定的人更可能沉迷其中,而外向、友善、自制力強的人相對不易成癮​。這些發現有助於我們理解不同人群在面對直播媒體時的大腦反應和行為差異,並為未來制定預防沉迷個性化內容推薦策略提供科學依據。

主要參考資料:目前對直播觀看者腦部與心理特徵的研究多來自心理學、神經科學和成癮醫學領域,包括針對短影音的功能性磁共振研究​

、網路成癮青少年的腦成像對照研究​、以及直播使用者的性格與動機調查​等。總的來說,經常觀看直播大腦獎賞迴路高度活化專注與控制功能相對減弱有關聯,同時這類行為也與特定人格特質相伴發生。雖然直播帶來的刺激遠不及成癮物質對大腦的直接作用,但長期大量觀看的潛在風險(例如注意力下降、衝動控制變差)不容忽視。後續研究正持續深入,以更明確區分因果關係(例如究竟是某些人格使人容易沉迷,還是沉迷行為改變了人格及大腦)並探索緩解不良影響的方法。


Citations
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The “online brain”: how the Internet may be changing our cognition - PMC
remains a central topic of investigation. Here we draw on recent psychological, psychiatric and neuroimaging findings to examine several key hypotheses on how the Internet may be changing our cognition. Specifically, we explore how unique features of the online world may be influencing: a) attentional capacities, as the constantly evolving stream of online information encourages our divided attention across multiple media sources, at the expense of sustained concentration; b) memory processes, as this vast and ubiquitous source of online information begins to shift the way we retrieve, store, and even value knowledge; and c) social cognition, as the ability for online social settings to resemble and evoke real‐world social processes creates a new interplay between
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The “online brain”: how the Internet may be changing our cognition - PMC
extensive) media multi‐tasking compared to those who did not. Cognitive testing of the two groups produced the then‐surprising finding that those involved in heavy media multi‐tasking performed worse in task‐switching tests than their counterparts – contrary to the authors’ expectation that the “extra practice” afforded by frequent media multi‐tasking would confer cognitive benefit in task‐switching scenarios. Closer inspection of findings suggested that the impeded task‐switching ability in heavy media multi‐tasking individuals was due to their increased susceptibility to distraction from irrelevant environmental stimuli23.
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
A Systematic Review on Common and Distinct Neural Correlates of Risk-taking in Substance-related and Non-substance Related Addictions - PMC
convergent altered risk-related neural processes, including hyperactivity in the OFC and the striatum. As characteristic for both addiction types, these brain regions may represent an underlying mechanism of suboptimal decision- making. In contrast, decreased DLPFC activity may be specific to SRAs and decreased IFG activity could only be identified for NSRAs. The precuneus and posterior cingulate show elevated activity in SRAs, while findings regarding these areas were mixed in NSRAs. Additional scarce evidence suggests decreased ventral ACC activity and increased dorsal ACC activity in both addiction types. Associations between identified activation patterns with drug use severity
m.thepaper.cn
短视频,正在吃孩子的大脑?
第一,是观看个性化推荐视频时,大脑默认网络出现了激活功能分离,即涉及当前情境和精神状态的子系统被显著激活,但与思考未来有关的子系统没有显著激活。
news.sina.cn
青少年网瘾危害多:过量多巴胺分泌令大脑受损_手机新浪网
多巴胺是一种重要的神经递质,它主要负责传递兴奋的信息[1]。从认知神经科学的角度来说,爱情之所以美妙,毒品之所以容易让人沉沦,皆是因为它们可以让我们的大脑释放出 大量的多巴胺。
nm.org
Binge-Watching and Your Health | Northwestern Medicine
When you're engaged in an activity you enjoy, your brain produces dopamine — a chemical that promotes feelings of pleasure, excitement and happiness. The release of dopamine helps us feel good, and it results in a "high" similar to that induced by drugs and other substances with addictive qualities. Your brain craves more and more, and as long as you continue to binge, your brain produces dopamine.
m.thepaper.cn
短视频,正在吃孩子的大脑?
第二,才是原文中关于多巴胺的内容:两类视频都会激活大脑黑质(SN),但个性化推荐视频还会激活腹侧被盖区(VTA),而SN和VTA都与多巴胺的分泌有关。
news.sina.cn
青少年网瘾危害多:过量多巴胺分泌令大脑受损_手机新浪网
智能手机,平板电脑,游戏机——生活在数字时代,这些设备早已成为很多人生活的一部分。电子设备通过为我们提供丰富的资讯和娱乐选择,为我们的生活带来了巨大的便利。不过 ,长期被裹挟在信息的浪潮中,我们的大脑常常面临着信息超载的困境。对儿童和青少年来说,这些电子设备更是大大增加了他们对网络和游戏成瘾的可能性。大量的研究表明,网络 和游戏成瘾都会对青少年的大脑带来功能和结构上的改变。下面就让我们来看看,过度使用电子设备上网和玩游戏可能会对儿童和青少年的大脑造成什么影响。
news.sina.cn
青少年网瘾危害多:过量多巴胺分泌令大脑受损_手机新浪网
多巴胺的释放会让我们感到快乐,甚至上瘾。科学家们很早就发现,人们在玩视频游戏的时候,大脑会释放出大量的多巴胺[2]。玩游戏本身是一件有趣的事情,大脑释放“快乐信 号”不足为奇。不过,长期释放大量多巴胺,我们的大脑会发生什么变化吗?
news.sina.cn
青少年网瘾危害多:过量多巴胺分泌令大脑受损_手机新浪网
另一项由韩国和美国科学家进行的研究表明[4],在连续十天每天玩一小时以上的网络游戏之后,实验参加者面对游戏信号时的大脑反应类似于药物成瘾者面对毒品时的大脑反应— —二者的背外侧前额叶皮层、眶额叶皮层、海马旁回和丘脑都会被激活(见图一)。
m.thepaper.cn
短视频,正在吃孩子的大脑?
首先,因为没有前人研究抖音是否会导致类成瘾行为(addiction-like behaviors),所以研究者找了208名年轻人被试来回答问卷。结果发现,被试的年龄与成瘾行为没有相关,有相关的是自控力:自控力越低,成瘾症状越严重。
news.pts.org.tw
短影音看多變抖音腦? 研究:影響兒少腦部發育 | 公視新聞網 PNN
match at L159 已經有研究指出,TikTok短影音會影響年輕人的衝動控制,以及評斷延遲滿足的能力。學童頻繁且長期觀看娛樂性短影音,會刺激大腦持續分泌多巴胺,美食和毒品都會引發同 樣的效應,時間一久甚至會出現上癮。
nm.org
Binge-Watching and Your Health | Northwestern Medicine
As a result, binge-watching can adversely affect your relationships, goals and commitments. You may struggle to manage how much time you spend watching TV, or you may find that you need to continually increase the time you spend watching TV to experience the same degree of satisfaction. You may become defensive, irritable or unreasonable when asked to stop, and you may even start lying to cover up your binge-watching.
nm.org
Binge-Watching and Your Health | Northwestern Medicine
in loneliness among individuals. People may often feel a sense of melancholy or feelings of frustration and emptiness after watching multiple episodes of a TV show in a row.
news.sina.cn
青少年网瘾危害多:过量多巴胺分泌令大脑受损_手机新浪网
18名网络成瘾青少年与15名健康青少年的大脑成像结果,他们发现,“网瘾”青少年在某些大脑区域的灰质密度显著低于对照组,其中包括与成瘾密切相关的脑岛和控制情绪的扣 带回(见图二)。
news.sina.cn
青少年网瘾危害多:过量多巴胺分泌令大脑受损_手机新浪网
认知功能的脑区之中,也可能出现在主管情绪功能的脑区之中。
nm.org
Binge-Watching and Your Health | Northwestern Medicine
depression, insomnia, anxiety, stress, and loneliness. * Back problems. Posture is an important part of spine health. Poor posture while watching TV can cause your spine to be curved or weak, leading to back pain and musculoskeletal issues.
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Who Watches Live Streaming in China? Examining Viewers’ Behaviors, Personality Traits, and Motivations - PMC
With millions of viewers globally, live streaming is a new social media that can deliver video content in real time and with many social interaction functions. Our research aims to understand the personality traits and the motivations of active live streaming viewers as well as their user behaviors in the general population in China. Our results indicate that extraversion was negatively associated with live streaming use, while openness was positively associated. The main motivations to watch live streaming were social interaction, information gathering, and entertainment, and they were associated with different frequencies of use and genre selection. Financial tipping behavior was
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Who Watches Live Streaming in China? Examining Viewers’ Behaviors, Personality Traits, and Motivations - PMC
Previous studies indicate that extraverts are sociable and talkative people actively engaging in various activities in the virtual world. For example, extraverts were found to belong to more Facebook groups (Ross et al., 2009 ) and were more likely to use the communicative functions of SNS ( 40). However, the negative association of extraversion and SNS use was supported by findings from Wang et al. (2012) in using the online gaming functions of SNS. 41 explained that the popularity of SNS may contribute to the conflicting results. When the popularity grows, more people switch to those online social networking platforms. Therefore, earlier
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Who Watches Live Streaming in China? Examining Viewers’ Behaviors, Personality Traits, and Motivations - PMC
Cheng et al. (2019) found that agreeableness was negatively and neuroticism was positively related to the addictive use of live video streaming, but other personality traits showed no significant relationship. Other scholars looked into the personality patterns of streamers and suggested that low in openness, conscientiousness, and extraversion but high in neuroticism during the streaming tend to own more popularity ( 39). However, to our knowledge, no study has yet examined how personality traits are associated with the viewers’ general live streaming use. Thus, we grounded our hypotheses in broad SNS research and considered the features of live streaming.
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Who Watches Live Streaming in China? Examining Viewers’ Behaviors, Personality Traits, and Motivations - PMC
The neuroticism–loneliness hypothesis proposed that neurotics could use the Internet to avoid loneliness and escape from everyday life (e.g., Hamburger and Ben-Artzi, 2003 ). Findings have supported that neurotics demonstrate a strong interest in using Facebook for socializing ( 45; Hughes et al., 2012). The room setting in live streaming forms groups of people with similar interests and facilitates group communication with real-time chat functions. Thus, we suggest this association stands in live streaming:
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Who Watches Live Streaming in China? Examining Viewers’ Behaviors, Personality Traits, and Motivations - PMC
Recently, research investigated what drives people to tip and found that social interaction plays an important role (Deng and Chau, 2019 ; 67). Lu et al. (2018) interviewed users and suggested that tipping facilitates users to present and express themselves. Tipping also helps viewers win attention and admiration from other viewers. 68 proposed a model and argued that tipping can build up swift guanxi between streamers and viewers. This is consistent with previous findings of virtual goods in online games. The findings suggested that the sociability of online games is significantly associated with the intention to purchase (Animesh et al., 2011) and how much real money players spend to purchase virtual goods
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Who Watches Live Streaming in China? Examining Viewers’ Behaviors, Personality Traits, and Motivations - PMC
* H8:

2025/03/06

PlayStation 5 數位版(PS5 Digital Edition)上建立帳號並訂購會員及遊戲的步驟

1. 建立 PlayStation Network (PSN) 帳號

開機並連接網路

  • 確保 PS5 已連接至 Wi-Fi 或有線網路。

進入 PSN 設定

  1. 開機後,在主畫面選擇 「設定 (Settings)」 > 「使用者與帳號 (Users and Accounts)」

  2. 選擇 「帳號 (Account)」 > 「登入 (Sign In)」

註冊新帳號

  1. 點擊 「建立帳號 (Create an Account)」

  2. 輸入 電子郵件、出生日期、地區(影響商店內容)。

  3. 設定 密碼 並選擇 PSN ID(你的線上名稱)。

  4. 輸入額外的個人資訊(如姓名)。

驗證帳號

  • 系統會發送驗證郵件至你的電子郵件信箱,開啟郵件並點擊驗證連結。

完成設定

  • 回到 PS5,完成帳號設定,即可登入。


2. 訂購 PlayStation 會員

透過 PS5 訂購 PlayStation Plus

進入 PlayStation Store

  1. 在 PS5 主畫面選擇 「PlayStation Store」

選擇 PlayStation Plus 方案

  1. 找到 「PlayStation Plus」,選擇適合的方案:

    • Essential(基本方案)

    • Extra(額外方案)

    • Deluxe(亞洲地區)/Premium(最高級方案)

  2. 選擇 1 個月、3 個月或 12 個月 的訂閱。

  3. 按下 「加入購物車」 並進入結帳。

付款方式

  • 信用卡 / 簽帳金融卡

  • PayPal(部分地區)

  • PSN 錢包(可透過 PlayStation Store 儲值卡 充值)

  • 完成付款後,PlayStation Plus 會員即啟動。

透過電腦訂購 PlayStation Plus

  1. 開啟瀏覽器(Google Chrome、Firefox、Edge 等)。

  2. 進入 PlayStation Store 網站並登入 PSN 帳號。

  3. 選擇 PlayStation Plus 方案,加入購物車並完成付款。

確認會員狀態

  • 「設定」 > 「使用者與帳號」 > 「帳號」 > 「付款與訂閱」 > 「PlayStation Plus」,確認會員狀態。


3. 購買遊戲

透過 PS5 購買遊戲

  1. 進入 PlayStation Store

  2. 瀏覽或搜尋遊戲

  3. 按下 「購買 (Buy)」,選擇付款方式並確認購買。

  4. 下載遊戲,可在 「遊戲庫 (Game Library)」 檢視所有已購買的遊戲。

避免小孩擅自購買遊戲

方法 1:設定購買密碼驗證

  1. 進入 「設定」 > 「使用者與帳號」 > 「付款與訂閱」

  2. 選擇 「付款方式」

  3. 開啟 「購買時要求密碼」

方法 2:使用家長控制 (Parental Controls)

  1. 進入 「設定」 > 「家長控制/家庭管理」

  2. 選擇 「家庭管理」,找到小孩的 PSN 帳號。

  3. 設定 購買行為限制,包括 每月消費上限或完全禁止購買

方法 3:移除付款方式

  • 進入 「付款與訂閱」,刪除 信用卡 / PayPal,只保留 PSN 錢包。

方法 4:關閉 PlayStation Store 自動付款與續訂

  1. 進入 「設定」 > 「付款與訂閱」 > 「訂閱管理 (Subscriptions)」

  2. 關閉 「自動續訂 (Turn Off Auto Renew)」


4. 下載 PlayStation Plus 免費遊戲

  • 訂閱 PlayStation Plus 後,每月可免費下載 會籍遊戲

  • 進入 PlayStation Store > PlayStation Plus > 每月遊戲,按 「加入遊戲庫」

  • 即使未下載,未來仍可在會員期限內遊玩。


5. 啟用「主機共享」讓其他帳號使用會員(可選)

  • 若家人或朋友想共享 PlayStation Plus 會員與遊戲,可啟用主機共享。

設定方式

  1. 進入「設定」 > 「使用者與帳號」 > 「其他」 > 「主機與帳號分享與離線遊玩」

  2. 啟用「允許」,這樣其他帳號可共享會員權益。

  3. 注意:不同帳號的儲存記錄與獎盃是獨立的。


總結:建議的安全設定開啟「購買時需要密碼驗證」(避免不小心購買)。 ✔ 使用「家長控制」限制購買行為(設限小孩的 PSN 帳號)。 ✔ 移除信用卡 / PayPal,只用 PSN 預付卡(完全杜絕意外購買)。 ✔ 關閉 PlayStation Store 自動付款與續訂(避免自動扣款)。

這樣即可確保 PS5 使用安全,防止未經授權的購買行為!🎮🛡️


2025/03/01

廚房設備建議 chatgpt 4o

 現在擁有的廚房設備清單如下:

攪拌與乳化(Vitamix Pro 750、Cuisinart 手持攪拌機)
揉麵與麵糰攪拌(Kenwood Chef XL)
低溫烹調 (Sous Vide)(Anova Precision Cooker)
壓力燉煮、氣炸、蒸煮、烘焙(Ninja OL701)
麵條壓製(Marcato Atlas 150)
咖啡研磨(飛馬 600N 磨豆機)
全自動咖啡機(De'Longhi PrimaDonna Soul)
摩卡壺咖啡(Brikka 6 cups)
多功能蒸烤箱(Hitachi 水波爐 烤香)
戶外披薩烤箱(Ooni Koda 16)
三合一微波氣炸烤箱(Cuisinart AMW-60TW)


你目前的設備優勢

  • 微波爐 + 氣炸鍋 + 蒸烤爐 + 戶外烤箱都有了,涵蓋 所有加熱方式
  • 有專業攪拌、揉麵、低溫烹調、義式/美式咖啡機
  • 擁有戶外專用的高溫披薩烤箱
  • 壓麵機讓你能製作新鮮義大利麵
  • 擁有 Ninja OL701 & Cuisinart AMW-60TW 兩種氣炸烤箱,分開使用避免交叉味道影響

現在你的廚房設備已經足夠應對 幾乎所有家庭與專業料理需求。但如果想進一步提升 效率、飲品/甜點製作體驗,還有幾個補強點可以考慮。


目前可能的補強點

雖然你的設備已經相當完整,但如果你希望進一步提升效率、增強飲品與甜點製作體驗,可以補強以下設備:

1. 提升食材處理效率

不足之處影響的料理類型建議添購設備優勢
手工切菜較慢,備料繁瑣切絲、切片、絞肉、剁蒜食物處理機 (如 Cuisinart FP-13D)減少手工切菜時間,快速處理食材

2. 強化甜點與飲品製作

不足之處影響的料理類型建議添購設備優勢
無法製作無渣豆漿、米漿、五穀飲豆漿、米漿、五穀飲豆漿機 (如 九陽 DJ10U-K61)自動加熱與研磨,比 Vitamix 更方便
無法自製綿密冰淇淋冰淇淋、雪酪冰淇淋機 (如 Cuisinart ICE-100)製作細膩冰淇淋,比 Vitamix 直接攪拌更均勻

3. 提升咖啡體驗

不足之處影響的料理類型建議添購設備優勢
手沖咖啡水溫控制不精確V60、手沖咖啡電子手沖壺 (如 Fellow Stagg EKG)精準控溫,提升手沖咖啡的穩定性

最佳補強建議

如果你想提升料理效率

  • 食物處理機(加速切菜、絞肉、切絲等前置作業)

如果你想提升飲品與甜點體驗

  • 豆漿機(製作更細膩的豆漿與五穀飲)
  • 冰淇淋機(製作細緻、綿密的冰淇淋)

如果你想讓咖啡體驗更專業

  • 電子手沖壺(精準控溫,讓手沖咖啡風味更穩定)

結論

你的廚房設備已經達到專業級配置,可以輕鬆應對大部分料理需求。如果想進一步提升效率或拓展特定料理類型,建議:

  1. 食物處理機(節省食材備料時間)
  2. 豆漿機(自動化製作更細膩豆漿)
  3. 電子手沖壺(提升手沖咖啡品質)
  4. 冰淇淋機(增加甜點類製作)

如果只選擇 1-2 項最實用的補強設備,建議 食物處理機 + 電子手沖壺,這樣能提升料理效率,又能讓咖啡體驗更穩定